<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Secure on the Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://secureonthenet.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://secureonthenet.com</link>
	<description>Just another wpms site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 17:04:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>e-padlock &#8211; simple email security</title>
		<link>http://secureonthenet.com/internet-users/email/e-padlock-simple-email-security/</link>
		<comments>http://secureonthenet.com/internet-users/email/e-padlock-simple-email-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alistair</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secureonthenet.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://secureonthenet.com/internet-users/email/e-padlock-simple-email-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security on the Internet</title>
		<link>http://secureonthenet.com/internet-users/internet-surfing/security-on-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://secureonthenet.com/internet-users/internet-surfing/security-on-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alistair</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Surfing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secureonthenet.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are some basic security precautions that you can take when internet surfing. These are mainly about good practice, but there are also some useful things you can do to improve security. Firewall and Antivirus It is vital that you use some form of firewall and antivirus program if you surf on the internet. There [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some basic security precautions that you can take when internet surfing. These are mainly about good practice, but there are also some useful things you can do to improve security.<span id="more-20"></span></p>
<h4>Firewall and Antivirus</h4>
<p>It is vital that you use some form of firewall and antivirus program if you surf on the internet.</p>
<p>There are free services available, and often these are as good, if not better than the paid for services.</p>
<p>A firewall is advisable, but if you are connecting behind a router (which will offer some protection) and you have an older machine, then you might be OK with a good all round antivirus/protection system and the Windows firewall.</p>
<p>The 3 main free programs are</p>
<p><a href="http://www.avast.com/free-antivirus-download" target="_blank">AVAST</a></p>
<p><a href="http://http//www.avira.com/en/free-download-avira-antivir-personal" target="_blank">AVIRA</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.avg.com/fr-en/free-antivirus-download" target="_blank">AVG</a></p>
<p>I have used them all and in the past AVG was a very good choice, as it was a compact program with small manageable updates, particularly useful if you are on a modem.</p>
<p>I still use it on some of our machines, but have started to use AVAST as it offers a good service with a reasonable level of load on the computer. I particularly like the SANDBOX feature, which is a computing term for a program that creates a temporary ‘Sandbox’ for newly introduced programs to be trialed but without the ability to make changes (which could be malevolent) to your PC. If you are happy with the program you can load it fully.</p>
<p>AVIRA is of a similar standard to AVAST, but does have a habit of nagging to upgrade to the paid for service.</p>
<h4>Choosing the right Browser</h4>
<p>Firefox has been my browser of choice for many years. It’s mix of innovation (first to have tabs), high level of security and amazing range of plugins to provide extra facilities makes it a very good browser. Recently, it has started to become much bigger and resource hungry, but if you have a relatively new machine, this should not be a major issue.</p>
<p>I only use Internet Explorer if I have to – perhaps the site is Microsoft or one configured only for IE, and fortunately there are very fewof these now. I think that the later versions (post IE7) have started to improve considerably and are often the browser of choice for many people.</p>
<p>Chrome from Google is the new kid on the block. Originally independent, it has been developed by Google and is rapidly gaining share of the browser market. Widely acclaimed as one of the most secure browsers, it uses a ‘Sandbox’ type format with each TAB independent of each other, so making it particularly secure.</p>
<p>The good thing about browsers is that you can load on more than one and try them when you want. Both Firefox and Chrome are worthwhile additions if you already have IE installed.</p>
<h4>Control Scripts</h4>
<p>Scripts like ‘Javascript’ which is responsible for many of the innovations on web pages, making them more dynamic as they actually ‘run’ on your computer (this site uses Javascript as part of the WordPress system) and ‘Flash’ a software protocol that allows video and graphic imagery to be added with a range of processing features to play games, or manipulate the graphics, which also runs on your computer.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, these features are often used to create malicious programs which are effectively ‘invited’ onto your machine by you and your browser, making them difficult to combat by protection software, until it is too late.</p>
<p>Most browsers enable you to stop both these types of scripts from running, unfortunately they will often stop sites that you want from running too, so it can be a tricky balance. Plus, you need to set it up in preferences which can make it frustrating for sites you know.</p>
<p>I use ‘<a href="http://noscript.net/" target="_blank">Noscript</a>’ plugin for Firefox, which effectively stops all scripts on a site when you land on it. It tells you that it has done so and you can change as required. You then have the option to ALLOW scripts on the site (which will allow them permanently – as the site details will be stored for future visits), or TEMPORARILY ALLOW for the duration of your visit. Flash panels are blocked and you have the option to run, if you want. If you are on a site you trust, you simply enable the scripts.</p>
<p>The main downside is that you may have to reload the page after you enable the scripts as they have to restart – particularly for forms and the like – however, you soon get into the habit of checking the scripts on sites you trust, and once done the browser will remember your approval for next time.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, there is no equivalent for Chrome yet. Internet Explorer 8 uses filters, but I believe these are not as comprehensive as NOSCRIPT.</p>
<h4>Non-Windows</h4>
<p>My summary has been based on Windows browsers. MAC users with Safari seem to be poorly served, security-wise – but Firefox is also available for MAC as well as LINUX – probably the safest option still of the commonly available PC operating systems. The best combination proably being LINUX, with firewall enabled and running Firefox with NOSCRIPT plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://secureonthenet.com/internet-users/internet-surfing/security-on-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Passwords &#8211; Size Matters</title>
		<link>http://secureonthenet.com/passwords/passwords-size-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://secureonthenet.com/passwords/passwords-size-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alistair</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Password Padding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secureonthenet.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Current Practice Every internet user should have a basic understanding of passwords and security, unfortunately they don&#8217;t and this could lead to the compromise of their personal data. A security breach of an internet gaming site led to the publication of 32 million passwords on the internet. No personal information was given but the list [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Current Practice</h2>
<p>Every internet user should have a basic understanding of passwords and security, unfortunately they don&#8217;t and this could lead to the compromise of their personal data.</p>
<p>A security breach of an internet gaming site led to the publication of 32 million passwords on the internet. No personal information was given but the list of passwords proved very interesting. A study by <a title="Password Worst Practices" href="http://www.imperva.com/docs/WP_Consumer_Password_Worst_Practices.pdf" target="_blank">Imperva</a> showed the following:<span id="more-9"></span></p>
<p><strong></strong> 30% of passwords where 6 characters or less<br />
60% contained a limited set of alpha-numeric characters.<br />
50% of passwords were names, slang words, dictionary words, consecutive digits, or adjacent keyboard keys.</p>
<p>The most common password among Rockyou.com account owners is “123456”, the 4th most popular &#8220;password&#8221;.</p>
<p>Password cracking is a 2 part process:</p>
<p>(1) <strong>Intelligent guessing</strong>- the first attempts will be based on most likely passwords so obvious ones like &#8216;password&#8217; will be tried first (please don&#8217;t use password!). It will also use known passwords for the same username found elsewhere. But this will then move onto other dictionary words and names.</p>
<p>(2) <strong>Brute Force guessing</strong> &#8211; here a systematic guessing process will take place based on character combinations of increasing length. It is likely to start with lowercase and numbers as these are the most likely to be used.</p>
<p>The speed of modern computing and ADSL means that this process can become an increasing security issue.</p>
<h2>Help is at Hand</h2>
<p>Now it seems you are stuck between a simple password you can remember which is easily broken, or a meaningless jumble of characters that you forget. However that is not the case if you follow a 3 stage process of defence.</p>
<p><em><strong>Stage One</strong></em></p>
<p>Do not use a dictionary name word, or even a part of one and make sure you include at least one number, uppercase letter, lower case letter and another keyboard character (if you can). This will force an attacker past the intelligent guessing stage as your password will not appear in any dictionary or shortlist of possible passwords.</p>
<p>It will also make any brute force attack slower as the number of variables will go up.</p>
<p>Only numbers used &#8211; 10 permutations per password character.</p>
<p>Lower case letters and numbers &#8211; 36 permutations per password character.</p>
<p>Upper and lower case letters and numbers &#8211; 62 permutations per password character.</p>
<p>Upper and lower case letters, numbers and characters &#8211; 95 permutations per password character.</p>
<p><em><strong>Stage Two</strong></em></p>
<p>Try not to use the same username or password combinations for multiple web sites. Most definitely not for a social network site and your banking.</p>
<p>This will reduce the chance that a website you joined years ago is compromised (like the above example) and your personal information is matched to the username and passwords &#8211; a serious security risk to you.</p>
<p>If you want to use a standard password or username, try to adapt it slightly for each website &#8211; that way it is a little harder to guess. The adaptation could be as simple as using shared characters from the site name or some other variable you can remember.</p>
<p><em><strong>Stage Three</strong></em></p>
<p>Make the password as long as possible.</p>
<p>Groan! I knew you were going to say that, but that is the nub of the problem &#8211; that is why I use a short memorable password in the first place.</p>
<p>&#8216;<em><strong>Password Padding</strong></em>&#8216; to the rescue!</p>
<p>Once a brute force guessing approach starts the most important factors are the variable characters which forces the use of more permutations, and password length. You&#8217;ve done the first bit in stage one, so an attacker has to go through all the simpler passwords first, then onto the more complex ones, as you&#8217;ve hidden Upper case letters (eg: AZ) and special characters (eg:()*!) in your password.</p>
<p>The second is length and that is where <em><strong>Password Padding</strong></em> comes into it.</p>
<p>An attacker does not know the length of the password. He might know the maximum length based on the rules of the web site and has no idea of the composition of your password, nor how close any guess might be as he gets no feedback with a wrong guess. He can try a list of the obvious ones first, but we know that will not work.</p>
<p>Consider the two passwords below :</p>
<p>T4u&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Qy0$1xL5#</p>
<p>The first one is 10 characters long, uses a character set based on 95 permutations which gives 60,510,648,114,517,017,120 possible passwords, but importantly is very EASY to remember (T4u followed by 7 dots).</p>
<p>The second is only 9 characters, also uses a character set based on 95 permutations which gives only 636,954,190,679,126,495 possible passwords, but is very HARD to remember (it would also take 200,000 centuries for an online attack to crack, compared to over 19 million centuries for the easier to remember one!)</p>
<p>By contrast Qy0$ at 4 characters, but with 95 permutations gives only 82,317,120 possible passwords to be gone through (less than 23 hours online) and 123456 gives just 1,111,110 possibilities and could be broken in just 20 minutes in an online attack, assuming it is not the first one guessed!</p>
<p><em>So if you want to improve security make your password longer, and use the whole range of characters available to you.</em></p>
<p>Then keep it memorable by padding with multiple characters or use letters from a memory phrase or write it down and keep it safe &#8211; this might seem counter intuitive but you manage to keep your wallet or purse safe so put it here (most security experts would argue this is better than an easy to guess memorable password).</p>
<p>For a more technical discussion of the process check out <a href="https://www.grc.com/haystack.htm" target="_blank">Gibson Research Centre</a>, with their &#8216;Haystack Calculator&#8217; &#8211; a brilliant security site run by people with a better understanding of this than me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://secureonthenet.com/passwords/passwords-size-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.695 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-29 20:34:26 -->

